Does Video Evidence of a War Convey Truth?
Compiles & redacted from BBC, NPR, and The New York Times
It was just get¬ting light when the Turkish boat, packed with 546 activists, de¬scended into chaos, and Mahmut Koskun, a Turkish doctor on board, was in the middle of it. The crack of an Israeli sound grenade and a hail of rubber bul¬lets from above were supposed to disperse activists, but instead set them in motion. And when three commandos slid down ropes out of helicopters, a crowd set upon them. One soldier was stabbed and two were beaten. From that mo¬ment on, the attempted takeover turned into an armed assault with Israeli commandos opening fire. Within an hour, they had taken control of the ship, and nine Turks were dead.
Dozens of interviews in Israel and Turkey suggest that Israel’s decision to stop the flotilla at all costs collided with the intention of a small group of Islamic activists from Turkey, turning a raid on a ship of protesters in international waters into a bloodbath — and a major international event. The activists had set sail pre¬cisely in hopes of forcing the world to focus on Israel’s blockade of Gaza, something they had sought in vain in the past. This time they succeeded.
The deaths at sea on Monday have created a diplomatic fiasco for Israel. Its assault has been condemned around the world and ruptured relations with its closest Muslim ally, Turkey. Meanwhile, the Palestinians of Gaza, often ne¬glected in Middle East peace talks, have taken on new importance. In truth, the chaos and deaths on the ship, were not due to lack of planning. It was clear for at least a month to both the pro-Palestinian activists behind it and the Israeli government that they were on a collision course. But both severely miscalculated.
When Israeli commandos at¬tacked the Freedom Flo¬tilla, both sides were well armed — with video cameras — and both sides have released a blizzard of video clips as evidence that the other side was the aggressor in the conflict on Monday, which left nine activists dead.
Once again, the political power of the moving picture is on dis¬play, as it was last year when a video showing the death of a young Iranian protester named Neda became a symbol of resis¬tance in that country. The flotilla videos have proved a popular draw online, with one from the Israeli Defense Forces attracting more than 600,000 views on YouTube and scenes from both perspectives being shown in a continuous loop on television news shows all over the world.
But what is missing so far from the flotilla clips on both sides is context: it is difficult to establish the sequence of events or, more simply, to determine who at¬tacked first. The Israeli military has been particularly active, using its You¬Tube channel to post nearly 20 videos, sometimes enhanced by graphics and captions, trying to show that its soldiers were acting in self-defense.
“On a matter like this, public opinion is awfully important, in terms of determining which im¬age is really going to last,” said Jim Hoge, the editor of Foreign Affairs, who observed that there had been a gradual increase in the use of video clips to bear wit¬ness and shape opinion.
“First it was people in crowds with mobile phones,” he said, speaking about the Neda video. “Now, as is so often the case, gov¬ernments catch up and begin to use the tools for their own pur¬poses.”
Activists do, too. The flotilla’s organizers, from Insani Yardim Vakfi, the Free Gaza Movement and other groups, were Webcast¬ing live from the open seas as the confrontation started, using the services of Livestream, a New York-based company that hosts free Webcasts.
The organizers “chose to make their trip to Gaza a media event,” said Max Haot, Livestream’s co-founder. Aboard the boat was a “full multi-camera production,” he said, uplinked to the In
ternet and to a satellite that allowed news channels to rebroadcast live pictures of the raid in progress.
The fight over what happened on the high seas will soon become a distraction. Now Israel and its defenders need to be prepared to offer a strategic and moral defense for continuing with the blockade of Hamas-controlled Gaza. Or be prepared to offer an alternative. The anti-Israel forces will be armed with images of hungry Palestinian children and infrastructure damage in Gaza from the war last year. Combating them with videos of thugs on a boat attacking Israeli soldiers would be like, well, sending the cavalry into a line of machine gun fire.