Voices de la Luna

A Quarterly Poetry and Arts Magazine

Cover Page

Home Page

Featured Interview

Table of Contents

Reviews & Books

Views & News

Editors' Poems

Healing & Arts

Music & Poetry

Poetry & Art Therapy

C.G. Jung & Arts

Select Poems

Select Poems: Part II

Select Poems: Part III

Select Poems: Part IV

Select Poems: Part V

Select Poems: Part VI

Poetry & Dreams

Poetry as Therapy

Poetry Support Groups

Spoken Word

San Antonio Small Presses

National Poetry Month SA

Poetry & War

Select Prose

Short Prose

Select Photos

Art in the City

Archives

Subscription

Contact Us

The Organization

Events

Views & News
The Video War at High Seas
Texas Board of Education & Thomas Jefferson


Texas High School Students Learn about American History
 

Texas Board of Education & Jefferson
Voices Editors
Adopted from  NPR, The New York Times, BBC & the Associated Press
May 22, 2010

Texas schoolchildren will be required to learn that the words "separation of church and state" aren't in the Constitution and evaluate whether the United Nations undermines U.S. sovereignty under new social studies curriculum.
In final votes late Friday, conservatives on the State Board of Education strengthened requirements on teaching the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation's Founding Fathers and required that the U.S. government be referred to as a "constitutional republic" rather than "democratic."
          The board approved the new standards with two 9-5 votes along party lines after months of ideological haggling and debate that drew attention beyond Texas.The guidelines will be used to teach some 4.8 million students for the next 10 years. They also will be used by textbook publishers who often develop materials for other states based on those approved in Texas, though Texas teachers ave latitude in deciding how to teach the material.
          U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said after the votes Friday that such decisions should be made at the local level and school officials "should keep politics out" of curriculum debates. "Parents should be very wary of politicians designing curriculum," Duncan said in a statement. But Republican board member David Bradley said the curriculum revision process has always been political but the ruling faction had changed since the last time social studies standards were adopted.
"We took our licks, we got outvoted," he said referring to the debate 10 years earlier. "Now it's 10-5 in the other direction ... we're an elected body, this is a political process. Outside that, go find yourself a benevolent dictator."
          GOP board member Geraldine Miller was absent during the votes.
The board attempted to make more than 200 amendments this week, reshaping draft standards that had been prepared over the last year and a half by expert groups of teachers and professors. As new amendments were being presented just moments before the vote, Democrats bristled that the changes had not been vetted. "I will not be part of the vote that's going to support this kind of history," said Mary Helen Berlanga, a Democrat. At least one state lawmaker vowed legislative action to "rein in" the board. "I am disturbed that a majority of the board decided their own political agendas were more important than the education of Texas children," said Rep. Mike Villarreal, a San Antonio Democrat.
          Earlier in March, after three days of turbulent meetings, the Texas Board of Education on Friday approved a social studies curriculum that will put a conservative stamp on history and economics textbooks, stressing the superiority of American capitalism, questioning the Founding Fathers’ commitment to a purely secular government and presenting Republican political philosophies in a more positive light.
          In one of the most significant curriculum changes, the board diluted the rationale for the separation of church and state in a high school government class, noting that the words were not in the Constitution and requiring students to compare and contrast the judicial language with the First Amendment's wording. Students also will be required to study the decline in the U.S. dollar's value, including the abandonment of the gold standard.
         The board rejected language to modernize the classification of historic periods to B.C.E. and C.E. from the traditional B.C. and A.D., and agreed to replace Thomas Jefferson as an example of an influential political philosopher in a world history class. They also required students to evaluate efforts by global organizations such as the United Nations to undermine U.S. sovereignty. However, the changes include teaching that the UN could be a threat to American freedom, and that the Founding Fathers may not have intended a complete separation of church and state. Students in Texas will now be taught the benefits of US free-market economics and how government taxation can harm economic progress. They will study how American ideals benefit the world but organisations such as the UN could be a threat to personal freedom.
          And Thomas Jefferson has been dropped from a list of enlightenment thinkers in the world-history curriculum, despite being one of the Founding Fathers who is credited with developing the idea that church and state should be separate.
The doctrine has become a cornerstone of US government, but some religious groups and some members of the Texas Education Board disagree, our correspondent says. The board, which is dominated by Christian conservatives, voted nine-to-five in favour of adopting the new curriculum for both primary and secondary schools.


Membership Subscription
$30.00
One of the Gaza Flotilla Ship

Does Video Evidence of a War Convey Truth?

Compiles & redacted from BBC, NPR, and The New York Times

 

It was just get¬ting light when the Turkish boat, packed with 546 activists, de¬scended into chaos, and Mahmut Koskun, a Turkish doctor on board, was in the middle of it. The crack of an Israeli sound grenade and a hail of rubber bul¬lets from above were supposed to disperse activists, but instead set them in motion. And when three commandos slid down ropes out of helicopters, a crowd set upon them. One soldier was stabbed and two were beaten. From that mo¬ment on, the attempted takeover turned into an armed assault with Israeli commandos opening fire. Within an hour, they had taken control of the ship, and nine Turks were dead.

          Dozens of interviews in Israel and Turkey suggest that Israel’s decision to stop the flotilla at all costs collided with the intention of a small group of Islamic activists from Turkey, turning a raid on a ship of protesters in international waters into a bloodbath — and a major international event. The activists had set sail pre¬cisely in hopes of forcing the world to focus on Israel’s blockade of Gaza, something they had sought in vain in the past. This time they succeeded.

        The deaths at sea on Monday have created a diplomatic fiasco for Israel. Its assault has been condemned around the world and ruptured relations with its closest Muslim ally, Turkey. Meanwhile, the Palestinians of Gaza, often ne¬glected in Middle East peace talks, have taken on new importance. In truth, the chaos and deaths on the ship, were not due to lack of planning. It was clear for at least a month to both the pro-Palestinian activists behind it and the Israeli government that they were on a collision course. But both severely miscalculated.

           When Israeli commandos at¬tacked the Freedom Flo¬tilla, both sides were well armed — with video cameras — and both sides have released a blizzard of video clips as evidence that the other side was the aggressor in the conflict on Monday, which left nine activists dead.

           Once again, the political power of the moving picture is on dis¬play, as it was last year when a video showing the death of a young Iranian protester named Neda became a symbol of resis¬tance in that country. The flotilla videos have proved a popular draw online, with one from the Israeli Defense Forces attracting more than 600,000 views on YouTube and scenes from both perspectives being shown in a continuous loop on television news shows all over the world.

           But what is missing so far from the flotilla clips on both sides is context: it is difficult to establish the sequence of events or, more simply, to determine who at¬tacked first. The Israeli military has been particularly active, using its You¬Tube channel to post nearly 20 videos, sometimes enhanced by graphics and captions, trying to show that its soldiers were acting in self-defense.

          “On a matter like this, public opinion is awfully important, in terms of determining which im¬age is really going to last,” said Jim Hoge, the editor of Foreign Affairs, who observed that there had been a gradual increase in the use of video clips to bear wit¬ness and shape opinion.

         

             “First it was people in crowds with mobile phones,” he said, speaking about the Neda video. “Now, as is so often the case, gov¬ernments catch up and begin to use the tools for their own pur¬poses.”

          Activists do, too. The flotilla’s organizers, from Insani Yardim Vakfi, the Free Gaza Movement and other groups, were Webcast¬ing live from the open seas as the confrontation started, using the services of Livestream, a New York-based company that hosts free Webcasts.

          The organizers “chose to make their trip to Gaza a media event,” said Max Haot, Livestream’s co-founder. Aboard the boat was a “full multi-camera production,” he said, uplinked to the In

ternet and to a satellite that allowed news channels to rebroadcast live pictures of the raid in progress.

          The fight over what happened on the high seas will soon become a distraction. Now Israel and its defenders need to be prepared to offer a strategic and moral defense for continuing with the blockade of Hamas-controlled Gaza. Or be prepared to offer an alternative. The anti-Israel forces will be armed with images of hungry Palestinian children and infrastructure damage in Gaza from the war last year. Combating them with videos of thugs on a boat attacking Israeli soldiers would be like, well, sending the cavalry into a line of machine gun fire.


 

 


From IDF:
Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Voicesdelaluna.com
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached, or otherwise used, except with the prior
written permission of Voicesdelaluna, Inc.
Thank You

Web Hosting powered by Network Solutions®